• HTC Aria Review (AT&T) – the world in your pocket

    As of Jun 20th the latest HTC phone Aria has been available from AT&T carrier for $129.99 with a 2-year contract and an online discount. Not to be left alone in the list of monster carriers, AT&T decided to add a smartphone, that will be compatible with such device as EVO 4G and HTC Droid Incredible offered by Sprint and Verizon. “The... Read more»

  • Rumors about Google’s Chrome OS tablet going on sale November 26

    Today’s geek newspapers and blogs are rumoring about Google finally releasing Chrome OS tablet by the end of the year on Black Friday. It would be great for Google to put the tablet on sale on the busiest shopping day of the year, however, no public statement has been made yet and some sources dismiss these rumors and think the tablet will be... Read more»

  • HTC and Android (Google): How the partnership paid Well

    It sure is an exciting time to shop for a smartphone. Almost all phone manufacturers are coming up with Operating System’s to delight. However, HTC, the Taiwanese smartphone manufacturer has been reaping rewards and widespread popularity due to its association with Google’s Android. In fact, recent reports on the major mobile phone manufacturer’s... Read more»

  • Android 2.2 (Froyo) vs iPhone OS 4.0

    Apple and Google are two fierce rivals in this industry and with the release of  Apple iOs 4 and  Google Android 2.2, the competition has become more intense and interesting. Google’s smartphone initiative, Nexus One did not make it big in the industry however iPhones have always had an upper hand when it comes to the superior mobile handsets. But... Read more»

  • HTC Wildfire Review

    Introduction The range of HTC devices was running short on budget models. And that’s the main reason why the company produces low-cost solutions from time to time – think of HTC Touch 2 and HTC Tattoo, for example. These devices are simple, compact and moderately functional. However, their start was obviously higher than it should. Roughly... Read more»

Posted by AllHTC On March - 12 - 2010 View Comments

Apple vs HTC: The Real Purpose of Apple

According to the announcment of the analyst of Oppenheimer, Yair Reine, the lawsuit filed by Apple not long ago against the Taiwanese company HTC, is just the culmination of a series of threats designed to struggle with competitors. According to the data, early in January of this year, Apple held a series of talks with mobile phone manufacturers, where the company had expressed “growing dissatisfaction with” the alleged violation of its rights of ownership to the ideas set in the iPhone.

Though these negotiations were conducted in private atmosphere, it became known that their tone was rather rude. At the same time these rivals of Apple in the market of mobile technologies, according to Reiner, mostly tried not to touch the sphere of touch technology, the use of which would really irritate Apple. After all, last year in January, the COO of Apple Tim Cook warned that the company will use all available tools in its arsenal to struggle against the violations of its patents.

For example, until recently there were virtually no mobile devices supporting multi-touch in the U.S. market , which were not produced by Apple. Palm Pre  was an exception, which, according to Reiner, is not perceived as a competitor to iPhone. Recently, however, the situation began to change not in favor of Apple. Two high-quality smartphones, Motorola Droid and HTC Eris Android,  have appeared in the market to compete with multi-touch technology.

Naturally, this caused Apple’s resentment, rightly fearful that the smartphone iPhone will soon lose its status of “unique” device supporting multi-touch functionality, at least in the American market. According to Reiner, the leading phone manufacturers could regard Apple’s silence as a sign of assent, and flood the market with many multi-touch devices, especially after Google also implemented similar functionality in its Android smartphone Nexus One. Many experts are inclined to believe that Apple’s lawsuit against HTC has another real purpose that is to somehow precipitate Google, whose Android operating system and smart phones based on it are becoming a real threat to the iPhone.

Popularity: 100%

Related posts:

  1. Analysts: Apple vs HTC Battle can Last Long
  2. Apple Sues HTC for Patent Infringement
  3. How will Nexus One Look Without Apple Patents
  4. Google Stands Behind HTC in Dispute With Apple
  5. HTC Officially Rejects Patent Claims of Apple
Categories: Featured, HTC Phones



If You Enjoyed Reading This Post, Please Consider To Leave A Comment And / Or Subscribe To The Feed And Get Future Articles Delivered To Your Feed Reader Regularly.

  • Vitty
    fails....its check mate
  • leanna
    apple rules. no matter who's idea they stole, apple does it better. every time.
  • nehema
    Wth is Apple moanin about?
    HTC had touch and multi-touch long before Apple even came on the market. My old Prophet did that out of the box and through a fan app there was even more extended support for gestures. The Prophet was out in 2006 and the iPhone was out in 2007.

    Apple wasn't even dreaming of anything of the like. They were making ipods and incredibly overpriced PCs on which you can't even play decent games as always in a time when HTC was already into it's sixth generation smartphone.

    Not sure what retard could hand out a patent for something that was already on the market.
  • Soendoro Soetanto
    Win or lose... I have to admit Apple makes good products.
    Soendoro Soetanto
  • patenting multitouch gestures is as dumb as patenting pressing a key or opening a door. i don't understand that "I patent everything" behaviour. it seems like it's all about making money and stopping innovation. is that what people want?
  • lmd10
    The g1 phone by htc,android,google came out in Nov 2008 ...Apple needs to get over it
  • HTC is the King of all.
  • dbmuse
    I hope Google and HTC did their homework first before releasing their cell phone designs.... I consider google a smart company... don't let me down.
  • $B
    HTC makes nice looking items. Too bad they don't last, and their repair center is rape. $$$
  • Will_nonya
    that's odd, i have an HTC Kaiser which outlasted 3 of my co-workers iphones before i upgraded it. I have 2 other HTC phoens, older thant he kaiser, that are still going strong. From my experience HTC makes some of the best hardware out there. The few times i have needed repair parts i was able to purchase them directly from HTC and make the repairs myself for nest to nothing. Try that with Apple.
  • Dtkbop
    ...So is Apples...Who every heard of a mobile device you have to return back to the company just to
    purchase a battery...The first ipod I bought was infected with their greedy childlike marketing tactic.
  • Just wandering by...
    More important to me, since I am looking for a device to constantly receive all my emails and do internet research on-the-go (plus the occasional movie or game for entertainment) I NEED a device that I can swap out the battery on.

    While more and more places have outlets accessible, there are many times where it is inappropriate or they don't offer outlets to the public (most restaurants have 1 or 2 for their vacuum cleaners, but some places don't let customers use them). Heck, if I go on a week long camping trip, am I suppose to limit myself to car camping on a site with electrical outlets? Am I suppose to haul around a solar panel and either a DC to AC converter or a battery with charging port?

    So, yeah, most urbanites can probably live without the ability to access a battery, but it will always be a deal breaker for me. (Also, I never paid to have RAM or a card installed in my computer, why do they think I'd pay to have a battery installed?)
  • jamesyb0i
    the patent laws need to change, when technology like this is expected and taken for granted it's like saying you can't sell toffee apples because somebody else does
  • mike_s123
    "precipitate Google?" What exactly do you think that means? Cause Google to happen? Change Google from vapor to liquid?
  • mike_s123
    The illiteracy here is amazing. It would be correct to say "...precipitate Google jumping in to defend the Android OS," or "...precipitate some FUD against Google's Android OS...". But "precipitate Google" is simply meaningless, it's an incomplete thought/sentence. I suspect someone's using large words they don't understand in order to sound erudite/professional.

    Perhaps they meant "goad Google," which would make more sense.
  • ptg
    ya know they couldve been using a clever metaphor lol, like u said if they "make google happen" or get in this it could get really ugly
  • Nah, they probably mean to either set a legal precedent by challenging a company in court less likely to reach your local newspaper. Pre-emp, precedent, or prepare or would work better. Apple sued a pea farmer for using Pod in their name because it "violated" Apple's product trademark. Maybe the grammar police should go work for them rather than talking about the vapours. (Yes, there is a U in Vapour in the civilized world of Canada.)
  • Android
    u need some fact checking, the Nexus One was first to have multi touch not droid's....Also even the venerable G1 hardware was MT capable (and implemted by after market devs including the free dolphin browser for android)
  • Toby
    I tried ditching the iPhone for a Droid Eris. And as much as I don't like Apple's tactics and iron fisted control, I have to say that a lot of the Android interface is VERY much inspired by iPhone. I would almost say a complete ripoff of the iPhone but I will stop just short of that. And what's worse is that either Android doesn't perform as well or the service providers brand the phones and features into not working well.

    Needless to say I turned in my Eris and went and bought a 3GS. There is a reason manufacturers are borrowing heavily on the iPhone. It is more or less bullet proof. Apple is a bit fascist about it but at least the phone works well. And I can't say that for the Eris or the Droid, as far as I have seen with my Eris and with friends Droids that I have messed with.
  • Rakyth
    I won an iPod Touch in a contest and started using it instead of my Palm IIIxe. And as much as I don't like Palm's lack of marketting and open business style, I have to say that a lot of the Apple interface is VERY much inspired by the iPhone. I would almost say a complete ripoff of the Palm but I will stop just short of that. And what's worse is that either Apple doesn't perform as well or the light I'm working in, but the features are just not working well.

    Needless to say I sold the iPod Touch on Ebay and bought a new Palm. There is a reason Apple computers are borrowing heavilly on the Palm. It is more or less unknown and old. Apple is a bit of a dictator but at least it only crashes once a week. And I can't say that for the Palm or the Sharp, as far as I have seen amongst my own devices and my coworker's.
  • Just Wandering by...
    I wonder how many ways you can present a touch interface on a smartphone. Is it a situation where it is a truly unique design, or a situation where a manufacturer of slacks points at a jeans maker and says "look, they ripped off our idea".

    True, I haven't used and iPhone (only seen them about at my work), and overall it seems like a fairly basic layout. Should they be able to prevent any similar works coming out and stifle the smartphone market? If they aren't allowed to do so, would that mean the technology would not have emerged due to an inability to recoup R&D costs? Personally, I think it would have eventually come out because what the current market didn't form around Apple's innovation but around the availability of appropriate small touchscreens (an outgrowth of other larger touch screen technology).
  • Will_nonya
    I find this a very odd comparison. Iphone does set the fashion standard these days and you will see a lot of visual cues borrowed from it but the functioning of the phone itself and the way the user interacts with the phone is so completely different that I can't fathom how anyone would think android is a "complete ripoff".
  • RB
    I hope Apple wins! Otherwise, what is the purpose of a patent?
  • Ego
    To protect your own original ideas, not ideas other people came up with or obvious technological advancements that you decide to patent
  • arachnivore
    If the ideas are so obvious, why did no one else patent them?
  • Jainy
    I understand that there are still a few drive in movies left in the US. Apple will most likely sue them as well. After all, the do have a screen.
  • The9th
    It's so interesting to see the shift from Windows & Gates being Darkness and the Prince, to Steve Jobs becoming that.

    Maybe there is something to that cliché about human beings envying the success of others and wishing to destroy it and them.

    Maybe the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are indeed just a myth for Malthusian population control (or as Ebenezer Scrooge so nicely put it about those moldering in Britain's 18th/19th Century poorhouses, Margarita-free-villes, "If they're going to die, they should die soon--and decrease the excess population.
  • droopy
    Patents cannot be awarded for obvious ideas. Them's the rules, or at least supposed to be the rules. There are other criteria that can prevent an idea from being patented, too. For example, an idea that is too vague or general, is supposed to be un-patentable. Of course, if you start looking through the patents on file at the patent office, you'll see stuff that violates those rules. Which just shows that our patent system is broken. Cheers.
  • Feldwebel WOlfenstool
    El Presidente Hu, and his lap-dog lackey, the Running-Dog Capitalist Tool Steve Jobs are tag-teaming Google.

    Feld W.
  • jescott418
    I hope Apple loses. Go get em HTC!!!
  • Dtkbop
    Since it's first fermentation into existence, Apple has stolen ideas from others efforts and called it their own. From the time of Xerox's first graphical interface to now (which they stole) have the same pirate like behavior as before. With there putrid, brainwashing methods of making people believe there products are superior to other as well as turning there consumers into judgmental, argent group in my opinion, makes this an evil, selfish company that should not be support. I wish Bill Gates didn't bail them out in 1997. We would have been rid of this instance of evil. However it probably would have surfaced to the other side like the oil spill in Mexico. Now many companies are taking there ideas and expounding on them. The babies (Apple) don't want to share the milk bottle...Aaaaahhhh...Beside...Apples are made to be eating!!! Eat them live HTC. Don;t even spit out the seeds for fear of them growing again.
  • I hope you realise that while apple did take the idea of a GUI from Xerox who designed it for the paperless office, Apple has made many more in innovations than any other company in the electronics and computing world. All you need ids a keen eye to see how many details of Windows were taken directly from Mac. When you add this to the reliability of Apple products and the fact that the software and hardware are made by the same people you get a product that is markedly better than anything else on the market.
  • Rakyth
    Apple products are reliable because they are designed to only provide a functionality in a familiar environment. Unlike Apple, PC's are modular in nature-I can take out my 300w PSU and get a 500w PSU to support a nVidia 9500 graphics card if I wanted to. I can customize every single bit of my computer. This, of course, can and will cause problems.

    Let's compare to Apple's computers. You buy them, use them for whichever apple-specific program, and never go beyond that. Remember the MacBook Air? Certainly had a lot of extra functionality like a Blu-Ray drive, a mobile wireless card..Right?

    No. It had two ports and little else. It was designed with little other use in mind.
blog comments powered by Disqus